jsji added a comment. > Besides, would it be acceptable that we add a variable to cmake to determine > default long double semantics (like current GCC)?
Yes, we can. But I think that can be in another patch, and we shouldn't rely on it -- as we shouldn't assume user will config/build clang/llvm on the target machine. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117181/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117181 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
