ro marked an inline comment as done.
ro added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/solaris-ld.c:20
// CHECK-LD-SPARC32-SAME: "-L[[SYSROOT]]/usr/lib"
+// CHECK-LD-SPARC32-SAME: "-zignore"
+// CHECK-LD-SPARC32-SAME: "-latomic"
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> If they are consecutive.
The are, patch amended.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/solaris-ld.c:46
// CHECK-LD-SPARC64-SAME: "-L[[SYSROOT]]/usr/lib/sparcv9"
+// CHECK-LD-SPARC64-NOT: "-zignore"
+// CHECK-LD-SPARC64-NOT: "-latomic"
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> Such NOT patterns are usually inadequate and may go stale pretty easily,
> since technically the patterns can occur in many places.
>
> One idea is to use --implicit-check-not; another is to enumerate all options
> and use the `{{^}}` style I picked in linux-cross.cpp, but perhaps your style
> is good enough if we can remember these library after after -L and before
> -lgcc_s
> Such NOT patterns are usually inadequate and may go stale pretty easily,
> since technically the patterns can occur in many places.
I wondered so myself: while this is currently the only instance of
`-zignore`/`-zrecord`, `-lgcc_s` requires similar treatment.
> One idea is to use --implicit-check-not; another is to enumerate all options
> and use the `{{^}}` style I picked in linux-cross.cpp, but perhaps your style
> is good enough if we can remember these library after after -L and before
> -lgcc_s
I'll check those. However, it occured to me that the crucial check is that
`-latomic` isn't added at all, `-zignore`/`-zrecord` or no, so maybe just check
for that and avoid the issue for the moment.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118021/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118021
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
