HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment. In D119682#3321975 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119682#3321975>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> I understand what you are saying re 'IndentRequiresClause' but this leaves us > with people with "IndentRequires" in their .clang-format without any > understanding of what it means? i.e. what about the 14.0 people? if we've > renamed an option then the documentation should carry something like > > 'Previously known as IndentRequires' That's not the first time we renamed something. And most likely not the last time. ================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h:2540-2541 /// } /// \endcode - /// \version 13 + /// \version 15 bool IndentRequiresClause; ---------------- Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119682/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119682 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
