dblaikie added a subscriber: shafik. dblaikie added a comment. In D113743#3177437 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113743#3177437>, @krisb wrote:
> In D113743#3175301 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113743#3175301>, @dblaikie > wrote: > >> Not super surprising that lldb might not be able to deal with DWARF in this >> shape - is LLDB support important to you/something you plan to work on for >> this DWARF? Otherwise we might need to opt-out of this functionality when >> tuning for LLDB, for instance. Unless LLDB-invested folks are interested in >> doing the integration work (& even then, maybe disabling it for LLDB tuning >> until that's fixed). @aprantl @JDevlieghere > > Thank you for the suggestion! > I implemented a small workaround that makes lldb behaves like if the types > have subprogram scope (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D115277), not sure I'll > be able to do something better any time soon. > So, if D115277 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115277> isn't acceptable, and > nobody volunteers to implement this properly, the only way to proceed is to > turn this functionality off for lldb. Thanks for having a go at a fix/workaround here. I think we'll still need to hear from Apple folks (@aprantl @JDevlieghere @shafik ) - I'm not sure what their backwards compatibility (new clang-produced binaries being debugged with an old lldb) requirements are. If they need some backcompat there, then I guess they/we/you would still need to disable this DWARF fidelity improvement when tuning for lldb. Hopefully that can be avoided, but I don't know. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113743/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113743 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
