On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:59 AM, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Reid - is this intended fallout? (seems plausible, but just checking) >> >> Is MinGW a good analogy for any of this work? (does it produce DWARF? >> Does it use the Windows ABI? Does it emit Calling Convention attributes?) >> > > It is intended fallout, but I didn't see it because I build 64-bit. This > causes LLVM to emit DW_AT_calling_convention in DWARF as well as the > equivalent in CodeView. > > My version of mingw (GCC 4.8) doesn't appear to emit any calling > convention attributes, so we're doing something new here. > Perhaps we shouldn't emit it if it's the logical platform default as it (to my naive understanding) appears to be here? - Dave
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits