jyknight added a comment.

In D118511#3371432 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118511#3371432>, @tstellar wrote:

> I'm fine with reverting if you think this is the best solution.  I just would 
> like to conclude soon so I can make the final release candidate.

ISTM that reverting the ABI change in the 14.x branch makes sense, to avoid 
ping-ponging the ABI for packed structs which would become non-packed (breaking 
ABI) in 14.x and packed again (breaking ABI) in 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119051.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D118511/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D118511

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to