kimgr added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-consteval.cpp:362-364
+ { A k = to_lvalue_ref(A().ret_a()); } // expected-error {{'alloc::A::ret_a'
is not a constant expression}} expected-error {{'alloc::to_lvalue_ref' is not a
constant expression}}
+ // expected-note@-1 {{temporary created here}}
+ // expected-note@-2 {{heap-allocated object is not a constant expression}}
expected-note@-2 {{reference to temporary is not a constant expression}}
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> I usually prefer line continuation characters because I think it makes the
> test easier to read (it's easy to miss secondary diagnostics on the same
> line). However, I don't insist on these changes either (but if you make them,
> please do similar for the other test lines you're touching).
Thanks, I wasn't aware there was support for line continuation. I agree it
would benefit readability here, so I'll look into it.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-consteval.cpp:365
- { int k = A().ret_a().ret_i(); }
- { int k = by_value_a(A()); }
{ int k = const_a_ref(A()); }
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Why are we dropping this test coverage?
Good question, that must've been a mistake. I'll take another look.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119477/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119477
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
