kimgr added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-consteval.cpp:362-364 + { A k = to_lvalue_ref(A().ret_a()); } // expected-error {{'alloc::A::ret_a' is not a constant expression}} expected-error {{'alloc::to_lvalue_ref' is not a constant expression}} + // expected-note@-1 {{temporary created here}} + // expected-note@-2 {{heap-allocated object is not a constant expression}} expected-note@-2 {{reference to temporary is not a constant expression}} ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > I usually prefer line continuation characters because I think it makes the > test easier to read (it's easy to miss secondary diagnostics on the same > line). However, I don't insist on these changes either (but if you make them, > please do similar for the other test lines you're touching). Thanks, I wasn't aware there was support for line continuation. I agree it would benefit readability here, so I'll look into it. ================ Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-consteval.cpp:365 - { int k = A().ret_a().ret_i(); } - { int k = by_value_a(A()); } { int k = const_a_ref(A()); } ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Why are we dropping this test coverage? Good question, that must've been a mistake. I'll take another look. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119477/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119477 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits