xazax.hun added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedOptionalAccessModel.cpp:269 + // the implication `(opt.value_or(X) != X) => opt.hasValue()`. + State.Env.addToFlowCondition( + State.Env.makeImplication(*ComparisonExprValue, *HasValueVal)); ---------------- There is an implication in the reverse direction as well. In case we know the optional is empty, we can prune one of the branches from the analysis. Is it possible to implement that with the current status of the framework? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122231/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122231 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
