2016-06-20 19:44 GMT+08:00 Peter Smith <peter.sm...@linaro.org>: > From what I can see, the EABI type is used to decide if certain > __aeabi_ prefixed functions such as __aeabi_idiv are available. If > Musl differs in function availability from the GNU library here I > think you'll need a Musl EABI type. However if there is no difference > you should be able to use the EABI::GNU type for Musl.
I think musl and glibc is compatible on this; I'm just a little concerned that using EABI::GNU for both GNUEABI* and MuslEABI* might cause some confusion. > You might find http://reviews.llvm.org/D12413 helpful here > (introduction of -meabi option). It seems clang's -meabi option is incompatible with gcc's. Lei _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
