jhuber6 added a comment. In D122592#3411741 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592#3411741>, @MaskRay wrote:
> Another idea is to refactor `tools::addOpenMPRuntime` to use the full path of > `libomp.so` or `libomp.a` instead of `-LXXX -lomp`. > The two ways have identical semantics when `libomp.so` has a `DT_SONAME` tag. It's technically possible for the runtime libraries to live somewhere else, I forget if any of our testers have a setup like that. > In the long term, perhaps libomp.so should be installed to the multiarch > directory like `lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libc++.so`. Could you elaborate on the benefits of using the multiarch directory? I'm not familiar with it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits