martong added a comment.

In D122805#3420111 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122805#3420111>, @steakhal wrote:

> In D122805#3419662 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122805#3419662>, @martong wrote:
>
>> In D122805#3419129 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122805#3419129>, @steakhal 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please add a test case where the class is trivial but the global variable 
>>> of such is non-const, thus the initialized expression is not imported.
>>
>> I've added a new case, but that is not very meaningful, because 
>> `clang-extdef-mapping` is not capable of emitting the USR for the non-const 
>> variable.
>
> What do you mean by //not capable//?

It uses `cross_tu::shouldImport()` which returns true only for `const` 
declarations. So, having a hand-written `extDevMapping.txt` that contains an 
USR for a non-const is not that meaningful, imho.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D122805/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D122805

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to