aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D122529#3422688 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122529#3422688>, @njames93 wrote:

> In D122529#3422158 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122529#3422158>, @aaron.ballman 
> wrote:
>
>> This looks.... good?.... to me. :-)
>>
>> Despite this complicating things by a fair amount, I don't have a better 
>> suggestion to offer. LGTM
>
> This was the "nicest" cheapest way I could think to implement this, It's also 
> why I thought it best to resubmit this for review.
> Annoyingly this is now suboptimal for 64bit code, but I'm not sure it's worth 
> writing 2 implementations for 64 and 32 bit.

Given that it has to do with crash analysis (which had better not be 
performance sensitive!!), I think I agree it's not worth writing two 
implementations for this.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D122529/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D122529

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to