erichkeane added a comment. In D119544#3459045 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544#3459045>, @tahonermann wrote:
>> This is a case where the function is a template instantiation but does NOT >> have a primary template, so I have to figure out what THAT means/what I >> should be using instead. > > I think that is not supposed to be possible. For example, > `FunctionDecl::isFunctionTemplateSpecialization()` will return `false` if > there is no primary template. I wouldn't think so either? In this case the problem is that 'u' is not in the re-manufactured scope, I think there is a bit of work to make sure that lambdas ALSO get the scope of their containing function, if they are in a functiondecl. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
