rsmith added a comment.

In D123345#3463224 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345#3463224>, @daltenty wrote:

> In D123345#3460639 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345#3460639>, @Jake-Egan 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, unfortunately there's a build failure on AIX: 
>> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/214/builds/779/steps/9/logs/stdio. 
>> Could you take a look?
>
> Hi, any feedback on the AIX break? Seems like this might be non-trivial to 
> address (were on an older libc++ level), so perhaps this needs a revert till 
> can be worked out.

Sorry, I somehow missed this. What you're seeing is a symptom of a libc++ issue 
(PR12704) that was fixed >10 years ago 
(rGbff1bfc6be0615ba3036a861fd27b75c96e3297c 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/rGbff1bfc6be0615ba3036a861fd27b75c96e3297c>). I don't 
think we have explicit rules on how old a version of libc++ we aim to support, 
but trying to use version 3.1 or earlier with trunk Clang seems at least a 
little unreasonable. That said, it's probably not too hard to work around this, 
so I will :) but I would encourage whoever is responsible for libc++ in AIX to 
look into an upgrade!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to