saugustine accepted this revision. saugustine added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This looks good and useful to me on the Tooling/Core side, but someone more familiar with the internals of NestedNamesSpecifiers should sign off on that portion. Also, I would probably add a test case for _Bool, which is a case that has confused other logic like this. I think it will work, but may as well include the proof. http://reviews.llvm.org/D21666 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
