tahonermann added a comment. > Since it is a C++23 feature, can we at least have it only if the user > requests C++23 standard compliance?
WG21 adopted P1949 <https://reviews.llvm.org/P1949> as a defect report (DR) against prior standards with the intent that the changes be applied retroactively. > Isn't it strange to force it upon users if they specify -std=c++20? This is how DRs are intended to be handled. > I checked the latest GCC 12. Despite P1949 <https://reviews.llvm.org/P1949> > support, I can use math symbols like 𝜕 and 𝛻 without any problem with any > combination of -std=c++xx, xx ≠ 98, xx ≠ 03. It looks to me like gcc implements an extension that allows additional characters not permitted by P1949 <https://reviews.llvm.org/P1949> to still be used in non-pedantic mode. Relevant gcc commits include: - https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c4d6dcacfca1b804504515496e6d9de176d7f51e - https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/7abcc9ca20d4e17deabb308b5f483aaccc3dc02c - https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c264208e161830a5642ee3125871c23110508462 > Thanks, God, there are reasonable people in the GCC team. Please refrain from such unhelpful comments. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104975/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104975 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
