dexonsmith added a comment. In D124816#3494243 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124816#3494243>, @dexonsmith wrote:
> - AFAICT, every call to `FileManager::setVirtualFileSystem()` is > fundamentally unsound unless the new FS is equivalent to the old one or the > filemanager hasn't been used yet. More precisely, I think calling `FileManager::setVirtualFileSystem()` is fundamentally unsound unless the new VFS behaves identically for every path the FileManager has accessed so far. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124816/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124816 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
