tschuett added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang-c/Index.h:3448 + CXCallingConv_AArch64SVEPcs= 17, + CXCallingConv_SwiftAsync = 18, ---------------- tschuett wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > peterwaller-arm wrote: > > > peterwaller-arm wrote: > > > > It shouldn't matter in principle (... "but in practice" ...) we should > > > > probably avoid renumbering existing things in the enum and instead add > > > > to the end of it. > > > > > > > > Nit, this is missing a space before the equals. > > > > Nit, SVE is an acronym, so is PCS, so capitalization should be > > > > consistent between the two. I see 'PCS' capitalized in AAPCS for > > > > example so probably all upper case makes the sense. > > > > > > > I retract my sloppy "it shouldn't matter in principle [at the source > > > level]", of course it does matter, and it likely matters in this case > > > (see 'alias for compatibility' comment above). > > > > > > To be more specific, changing the enum is an ABI break, and breaks if > > > these things are ever serialized and therefore not something you want to > > > do. > > +1 -- I was just making that comment when you beat me to it. > Could you please add your CC as 18 and add a comment the next CC will 19 and > do not touch the other ones. Do you want to add a `static_assert` to prevent people from doing stupid things? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124998/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124998 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
