ymandel marked an inline comment as done. ymandel added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-unchecked-optional-access.rst:29 + +Checking if a value exists, then accessing the value +---------------------------------------------------- ---------------- xazax.hun wrote: > I wonder if it would be easier to read if we had two top level categories, > one for safe and one for unsafe accesses instead of switching back and forth > between examples. Sounds good, done. Let me know if that's what you had in mind. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121120/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121120 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
