serge-sans-paille added a comment. In D124038#3504371 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124038#3504371>, @efriedma wrote:
> I think you're looking at old documentation? Here's what the current page > (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Compound-Literals.html) has to say: Indeed! I was looking at my local Info Page. thanks for the extra pointer. >> As an optimization, G++ sometimes gives array compound literals longer >> lifetimes: when the array either appears outside a function or has a >> const-qualified type. If foo and its initializer had elements of type char >> *const rather than char *, or if foo were a global variable, the array would >> have static storage duration. But it is probably safest just to avoid the >> use of array compound literals in C++ code. I can quote that part instead. I don't think this invalidates the actual code, right? At least with that commit the observable behavior gets closer to GCC, and it fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/39324 CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124038/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124038 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
