aaron.ballman added a reviewer: clang-language-wg. aaron.ballman added a comment.
Adding the language WG as a reviewer in case others have opinions. > The underlying problem is basically wg21.link/cwg362 which has no concensus > yet. According to https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#362 this was resolved in CD1 and we track it as being not applicable to us (https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_dr_status.html#362). (Is our status actually correct for this?) > Will the reviewers be supportive if I make the original cwg362 test case work > too? To me, it depends on what it does to compile times and memory overhead for the compiler when run on large projects. If the extra tracking is cheap and doesn't really impact anything, I think it's reasonable to want to match GCC's behavior. If it turns out this is expensive, I'm less keen on matching GCC. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126341/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126341 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
