On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:39 AM Andrzej Warzynski via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> > 1. Lets rename `flang` as `flang-to-external-fc` regardless of what's > decided for `flang-new`. That would already be a huge step forward (and > would reflect accurately what the bash wrapper script actually does). > I support this. I think the proposed new name is better reflects what the current flang script currently does and thereby reduces the likelihood of surprise when a user sees an error message from an external compiler. > 2. As for the NAG test suite, I hope that we can agree not to use it as > the condition for renaming `flang-new`. If it's decided that that's a valid > requirement, then I agree with @kiranchandramohan that we should find a way > to openly track the progress towards the required pass rate (and how that's > defined). > I agree. > Perhaps we could discuss more in the call today? > Any news from the call? Damian
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
