ChuanqiXu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.scope/basic.scope.namespace/p2.cpp:32
void test_early() {
- in_header = 1; // expected-error {{missing '#include "foo.h"'; 'in_header'
must be declared before it is used}}
- // expected-note@*{{not visible}}
+ in_header = 1; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'in_header'}}
----------------
This error message looks worse. I image I could hear users complaining this. (I
doesn't say it is your fault since this is specified in standard and the
standard cases are harder to understand). I want to know if this is consistent
with GCC?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
