Author: Gabor Marton
Date: 2022-06-02T11:41:19+02:00
New Revision: 81e44414aa925f5dcaf05ef658d1bffd8937ef4c

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/81e44414aa925f5dcaf05ef658d1bffd8937ef4c
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/81e44414aa925f5dcaf05ef658d1bffd8937ef4c.diff

LOG: [analyzer][NFC] Move overconstrained check from reAssume to assumeDualImpl

Depends on D126406. Checking of the overconstrained property is much
better suited here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126707

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState.h
    clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
    clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git 
a/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState.h 
b/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState.h
index 78abd0a0e42d7..ffae070b48a9f 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState.h
@@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ class ProgramState : public llvm::FoldingSetNode {
   // overconstrained-related functions. We want to keep this API inaccessible
   // for Checkers.
   friend class ConstraintManager;
-  friend ProgramStateRef reAssume(ProgramStateRef State,
-                                  const RangeSet *Constraint, SVal TheValue);
   bool isPosteriorlyOverconstrained() const {
     return PosteriorlyOverconstrained;
   }

diff  --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp 
b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
index 096266f75ce6c..8b04d3df845d9 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ template <typename AssumeFunction>
 ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair
 ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl(ProgramStateRef &State,
                                   AssumeFunction &Assume) {
+  if (State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained())
+    return {State, State};
+
   ProgramStateRef StTrue = Assume(true);
 
   if (!StTrue) {

diff  --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp 
b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
index bf535a8d02057..e788a7a608302 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
 #include "llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/ImmutableSet.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
-#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
 #include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
 #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
 #include <algorithm>
@@ -2535,19 +2535,10 @@ EquivalenceClass::removeMember(ProgramStateRef State, 
const SymbolRef Old) {
   return State;
 }
 
-// We must declare reAssume in clang::ento, otherwise we could not declare that
-// as a friend in ProgramState. More precisely, the call of reAssume would be
-// ambiguous (one in the global namespace and an other which is declared in
-// ProgramState is in clang::ento).
-namespace clang {
-namespace ento {
 // Re-evaluate an SVal with top-level `State->assume` logic.
 LLVM_NODISCARD ProgramStateRef reAssume(ProgramStateRef State,
                                         const RangeSet *Constraint,
                                         SVal TheValue) {
-  assert(State);
-  if (State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained())
-    return nullptr;
   if (!Constraint)
     return State;
 
@@ -2570,8 +2561,6 @@ LLVM_NODISCARD ProgramStateRef reAssume(ProgramStateRef 
State,
   return State->assumeInclusiveRange(DefinedVal, Constraint->getMinValue(),
                                      Constraint->getMaxValue(), true);
 }
-} // namespace ento
-} // namespace clang
 
 // Iterate over all symbols and try to simplify them. Once a symbol is
 // simplified then we check if we can merge the simplified symbol's equivalence


        
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to