MaskRay accepted this revision.
MaskRay added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM from my perspective, but this needs someone else's review.



================
Comment at: llvm/tools/llvm-driver/llvm-driver.cpp:50
+  bool ConsumeFirstArg = false;
+  if (LaunchedTool == "llvm") {
+    if (Argc < 2)
----------------
abrachet wrote:
> MaskRay wrote:
> > Some distributions may want to use something like llvm-15. See some binary 
> > utilities how the version is handled.
> Thank's I've taken this from objcopy's code
The format of `cl::PrintVersionMessage();` is not so good for user-facing 
tools. Consider omitting it.

`llvm-objcopy --version` should probably use a style similar to `clang 
--version` but the priority isn't high.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D109977/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D109977

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to