Javier-varez added a comment.

Thanks for the review! Indeed this looks like it implements the defect report 
dr2171. I didn't realize there was a defect report about this, thanks for 
bringing it up. I am not sure If this behavior should also change for move 
constructors, but clang currently cannot declare defaulted move constructors 
with arguments other than `T&&` (so basically they are not trivial anyway 
because they are simply not allowed to be defaulted) and it seems GCC also does 
not allow it. In my opinion that should be fine as is, given `const T&&` is not 
quite sensible.

I updated the change with your suggestions. I used ClangABICompat 14 because 15 
is unreleased, so I keep the behavior to preserve the ABI if 
`-fclang-abi-compat` is called with argument 14 or less.

I also didn't manage to find out why the openmp tests are failing, I'll need to 
have another look at that.



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:9786-9789
+    if (RT && ((RT->getPointeeType().getCVRQualifiers() & Qualifiers::Const) ==
+               Qualifiers::Const)) {
+      ConstArg = true;
+    }
----------------
royjacobson wrote:
> I think this should work instead? No need to check for RT since we already 
> returned if !RT.
Ah, good point, lazy refactoring on my side!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D127593/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D127593

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to