zahiraam added a comment.

In D113107#3605797 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107#3605797>, @rjmccall wrote:

> I think on balance the right thing to do is probably to add an alternative to 
> `-fexcess-precision`, like `-fexcess-precision=none`.  We can default to 
> `-fexcess-precision=standard` and treat `-fexcess-precision=fast` as an alias 
> for `standard` for now.

In 
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-ffloat-store-900
 ,  it looks like when compiling C, the default is -fexcess-precision=standard 
which would align with this implementation and our default too. So I think we 
could use the same name for the option. 
-fexcess-precision=none corresponds to the current behavior.
-fexcess-precision=standard = -fexcess-precision=fast corresponds to this 
implementation.
Agreed?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to