aaron.ballman accepted this revision.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM aside from a minor nit in the testing.



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:4633-4637
 Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(Scope *S, AccessSpecifier AS, DeclSpec &DS,
                                  RecordDecl *&AnonRecord) {
-  return ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(S, AS, DS, MultiTemplateParamsArg(), false,
+  return ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(S, AS, DS, ParsedAttributesView::none(),
+                                    MultiTemplateParamsArg(), false,
                                     AnonRecord);
----------------
mboehme wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > It's surprising that we don't need to update this interface as well; is 
> > that inconsistency desired?
> This is OK because every caller of this overload happens to do 
> `ProhibitAttributes(DeclAttrs)`.
> 
> But now that you bring this up, I realize that this is risky. What if we add 
> another caller in the future that doesn’t do 
> `ProhibitAttribubtes(DeclAttrs)`? And even in the current situation, I think 
> it makes sense to be explicit that we’re passing an empty list of attributes.
> 
> So I’ve added the `DeclAttrs` parameter to this function too, and now pass 
> `ParsedAttributesView::none()` at the callsites.
Thanks, I think this is more clear.


================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-declspec-ignored.cpp:3-6
+// For this test, we want the contents of the namespaces to be indented, which
+// clang-format doesn't like. Also, clang-format reformats the long lines in a
+// way that's difficult to read.
+// clang-format off
----------------
We don't typically put clang-format markings into tests -- we don't require 
that tests be formatted, and it's a bug that precommit CI continues to fail 
because of it (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55982).

Feel free to remove this bit when landing.


================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-declspec-ignored.cpp:62
+
+// clang-format on
----------------
Same here for this one.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to