sberg added a comment. In D126864#3614297 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864#3614297>, @MaskRay wrote:
> Oh, I did not see this when pushing a test > efd90ffbfc427ad4c4675ac1fcae9d53cc7f1322 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGefd90ffbfc427ad4c4675ac1fcae9d53cc7f1322> . > Consider adding additional tests in > `clang/test/CodeGen/bounds-checking-fam.c`. see https://reviews.llvm.org/D128783 "Check for more -fsanitize=array-bounds regressions" > It's worth bringing up such issue to the project. GCC and Clang have been > working around them so far but they should eventually be fixed. All the issues I encountered were in C++ code, and I'm not sure replacing one non-standard behavior (treating trailing length-one arrays as flexible) with another (C flexible array members) is something I feel confident to suggest to those projects. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
