klimek added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21814#476572, @bkramer wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21814#475322, @klimek wrote: > > > I think we really want 2 tools: > > a) one that is optimized for oldname->newname renames, and supports the > > multi-TU case really well > > b) one that is meant to be integrated with editors and works mainly off of > > a location in a file > > > > I'm a bit torn whether putting those 2 into the same executable is a good > > idea. Looping in Benjamin for additional ideas. > > > I'm fine with both things living in the same binary. The location thing is > just a different way of specifying the symbol name. I fail to see how that's > related to this review though. Well, it's about how much features we want to pack into the same binary; once we basically have multiple tools in one tool, adding more different use cases makes sense, I think. http://reviews.llvm.org/D21814 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
