ychen added a comment. In D128745#3632850 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745#3632850>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Thank you for working on this! Can you please add more details to the patch > summary about the changes? Thanks for taking a look. This was intended to correctly implement https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.deduct.partial#11. The test case is from https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.func.order#example-4. If, after considering the above, function template F is at least as specialized as function template G and vice-versa, and if G has a trailing function parameter pack for which F does not have a corresponding parameter, and if F does not have a trailing function parameter pack, then F is more specialized than G. It looks like this is not too far from implementing DR692. I'll go ahead and include the necessary change for fixing the `template parameter packs` case. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
