yaxunl added a comment. In D129301#3637664 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129301#3637664>, @jhuber6 wrote:
> In D129301#3637642 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129301#3637642>, @jdoerfert > wrote: > >> Isn't the offload bundler on it's "way out" (=replaced and then deleted >> soon)? > > HIP still uses it to create their `fatbinary` format for CUDA-like support > for multi-architecture binaries as well as their object file format. Once > D128914 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128914> is landed we can at least compile > HIP without it, but we would still need to use it to create the bundled image > until AMD decides to support my stuff in their runtime. Beyond that I'm not > aware of what the users will be now that OpenMP uses the new interface by > default. I'm not in a big hurry to delete this if people still have a use for > it, but I'd prefer things to use the new interface if possible. Are there any > other situations where we still need the `clang-offload-bundler`? If there's > anything the new interface is lacking I could add it in. I think before the new binary format supports Windows and -fno-gpu-rdc and HIP runtime support the new binary format, we cannot deprecate clang-offload-bundler. I expect that would take some time. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129301/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129301 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
