ldionne marked an inline comment as done.
ldionne added a comment.
In D121141#3652616 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121141#3652616>, @MaskRay wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> It may be related, @urnathan wants to add `-std=c++{current,future}` to GCC
> and may have opinions on the option name.
Interesting! @urnathan , is there any documentation/discussion on what
`-std=c++{current,future}` would do? I think it's unrelated to this specific
proposal, since `-fexperimental-library` is valid regardless of the Standard
mode, however I still think it would make sense to align what Clang and GCC do.
One idea we had floated around was `-std=c++latest` meaning the latest
officially ratified Standard, and `-std=c++next` being the one currently
cooking. For example, right now that would give us `-std=c++latest ==
-std=c++20` and `-std=c++next == -std=c++2b`.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121141/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121141
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
