asb added a comment.

In D129802#3653544 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129802#3653544>, @efriedma wrote:

> If we do decide we need to do something here, I'd prefer to model this using 
> explicit fences in the IR, as opposed to a new atomic ordering.  Adding extra 
> atomic orderings just makes everything harder to reason about.

+1. I think the bar for adding new memory orderings should be incredibly high. 
Memory models are complicated enough without introducing esoteric orderings 
that aren't clearly specified.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D129802/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D129802

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to