aaron.ballman added a comment. In D131307#3726631 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307#3726631>, @smeenai wrote:
> Was it intended that the warning generated here isn't silenced by `-w`, only > by an explicit `-Wno-enum-constexpr-conversion` (or `-Wno-everythning`), and > that `-Wno-error` doesn't downgrade the error? See > https://godbolt.org/z/s9qPveTWG for an example. Yes. That is the behavior of warnings which default to an error. The idea is: these aren't really *warnings*, they're errors that we let users downgrade for <reasons>. So `-w` shouldn't blanket disable them or users will be very surprised when that warning turns into a hard error in a future version of the compiler. So you have to explicitly disable warnings that default to an error. The same is true for `-Wno-error` behavior. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
