mizvekov added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h:2819-2823 + // For two canonically equal types, return a type which has + // the common sugar between them. If Unqualified is true, + // both types need only be the same unqualified type. + // The result will drop the qualifiers which do not occur + // in both types. ---------------- ChuanqiXu wrote: > For this comment, I want to know what if `X`and `Y` is not equal. Is there an > assertion failure or special type returned? Assertion failure, the function is supposed to handle only the case where `hasSame[Unqualified]Type(X, Y) == true`. It will always return a type `R` for which `hasSame[Unqualified]Type(R, Y) == true` also holds, so there are no special return values. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
