mwyman added a comment. In D86049#3818981 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86049#3818981>, @plotfi wrote:
> @ahatanak I can revive some of what I was working on from > https://reviews.llvm.org/D86049?id=285923 if we think we need a thunk for the > checks as @rjmccall mentioned. I believe the generated direct methods already handle the null checks and class init in `CGObjCCommonMac::GenerateDirectMethodPrologue`, meaning the thunks aren't strictly necessary for the callee to handle them. Could the thunks instead allow us to have publicly-visible mangled names (something akin to the new selector stubs `_objc_msgSend$selectorName` but for `_objc_direct$Class_selectorName`) while leaving the actual impl name alone, letting the stack traces see normal ObjC symbol names? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86049/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86049 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
