probinson added a comment. The option handling in clang-format itself would need to be updated as well.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormat.rst:29 USAGE: clang-format [options] [<file> ...] ---------------- MyDeveloperDay wrote: > if response files are so common place why not say it here > > `clang-format [options] [@file]` > > I personally don't believe we need to document how a shell works Pretty sure it's not the shell doing the expansion here? Certainly Clang has explicit code for deciding between gnu-style and windows-style handling. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135115/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135115 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
