ilya-biryukov added a comment. In D134529#3845617 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134529#3845617>, @sberg wrote:
> I just ran into newly-failing > It looks to me like this is correctly rejected now per P2468R2. Yes, this is intentional, the behavior of the code is the same as in C++17. > But it is rather confusing that a note mentions the `S2` candidate, while the > relevant `S1` operators `==` and `!=` are not mentioned at all. The diagnostic is indeed not very helpful and it would be nice to improve it. However, this is unrelated to this change, e.g. it reproduces <https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/5nGzv1bnb> in C++17 mode with Clang 10. In D134529#3845050 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134529#3845050>, @royjacobson wrote: > Should cxx_status.html be updated as well? It's listed there as a C++2b paper. @usaxena95 we have forgotten to do this indeed. Could you please update the relevant html file? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134529/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134529 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
