arsenm added a comment. In D130096#3850708 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096#3850708>, @b-sumner wrote:
>> Different functions providing different behaviors can be handled at link >> time like any other function, instead of the same functions providing >> different behaviors per translation unit and requires cloning. The current >> scheme transfers complexity from the device library build system into the >> driver and user binaries > > OK, but we are talking about trading a solved problem with a solution working > for years for adding a large amount of new work and new maintenance and new > bugs. Does this need to be done now, or at all? I wouldn't really call it a solved problem when only one of the many users is currently linking these libraries correctly Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
