tom-anders created this revision.
tom-anders added reviewers: nridge, sammccall.
Herald added subscribers: kadircet, arphaman.
Herald added a project: All.
tom-anders requested review of this revision.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, MaskRay, ilya-biryukov.
Herald added a project: clang-tools-extra.

Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1222. As discussed there, we saw 
no reason to keep this check.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D135892

Files:
  clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp
  clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp


Index: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp
@@ -847,6 +847,17 @@
             const char *$LocalVariable_decl_readonly[[s]] = 
$LocalVariable_readonly_static[[__func__]];
         }
       )cpp",
+      // Issue 1022: readonly modifier for generic parameter
+      R"cpp(
+        template <typename $TemplateParameter_decl[[T]]>
+        auto $Function_decl[[foo]](const $TemplateParameter[[T]] 
$Parameter_decl_readonly[[template_type]], 
+                                   const $TemplateParameter[[auto]] 
$Parameter_decl_readonly[[auto_type]], 
+                                   const int 
$Parameter_decl_readonly[[explicit_type]]) {
+            return $Parameter_readonly[[template_type]] 
+                 + $Parameter_readonly[[auto_type]] 
+                 + $Parameter_readonly[[explicit_type]];
+        }
+      )cpp",
       // Explicit template specialization
       R"cpp(
         struct $Class_decl[[Base]]{};
Index: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
 
 // Whether T is const in a loose sense - is a variable with this type readonly?
 bool isConst(QualType T) {
-  if (T.isNull() || T->isDependentType())
+  if (T.isNull())
     return false;
   T = T.getNonReferenceType();
   if (T.isConstQualified())


Index: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp
@@ -847,6 +847,17 @@
             const char *$LocalVariable_decl_readonly[[s]] = $LocalVariable_readonly_static[[__func__]];
         }
       )cpp",
+      // Issue 1022: readonly modifier for generic parameter
+      R"cpp(
+        template <typename $TemplateParameter_decl[[T]]>
+        auto $Function_decl[[foo]](const $TemplateParameter[[T]] $Parameter_decl_readonly[[template_type]], 
+                                   const $TemplateParameter[[auto]] $Parameter_decl_readonly[[auto_type]], 
+                                   const int $Parameter_decl_readonly[[explicit_type]]) {
+            return $Parameter_readonly[[template_type]] 
+                 + $Parameter_readonly[[auto_type]] 
+                 + $Parameter_readonly[[explicit_type]];
+        }
+      )cpp",
       // Explicit template specialization
       R"cpp(
         struct $Class_decl[[Base]]{};
Index: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
 
 // Whether T is const in a loose sense - is a variable with this type readonly?
 bool isConst(QualType T) {
-  if (T.isNull() || T->isDependentType())
+  if (T.isNull())
     return false;
   T = T.getNonReferenceType();
   if (T.isConstQualified())
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to