aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/Function.cpp:39
+  assert(It != SrcMap.end());
+  It--; // We want the offset *before* the given one.
   return It->second;
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> While I think the comment here is correct, the decrement itself certainly 
> isn't.
Which comment and which decrement? (Or is this a stale review comment?)


================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/Interp.h:1131
+static bool Call(InterpState &S, CodePtr &PC, const Function *Func) {
+  auto *NewFrame = new InterpFrame(S, Func, PC);
+  if (Func->hasThisPointer()) {
----------------
Use a `unique_ptr` for this?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D135513/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D135513

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to