Should we fix the diagnostic? Or is the code triggering it just esoteric enough to not be a good justification for changing the warning?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:42 PM Richard Smith via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: rsmith > Date: Tue Jul 19 15:35:09 2016 > New Revision: 276022 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276022&view=rev > Log: > Attempt to bring peace to -Werror buildbots. > > Modified: > libcxxabi/trunk/test/catch_reference_nullptr.pass.cpp > > Modified: libcxxabi/trunk/test/catch_reference_nullptr.pass.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxxabi/trunk/test/catch_reference_nullptr.pass.cpp?rev=276022&r1=276021&r2=276022&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- libcxxabi/trunk/test/catch_reference_nullptr.pass.cpp (original) > +++ libcxxabi/trunk/test/catch_reference_nullptr.pass.cpp Tue Jul 19 > 15:35:09 2016 > @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ > #include <cassert> > #include <cstdlib> > > +// Clang emits a warning on converting an object of type nullptr_t to > bool, > +// even in generic code. Suppress it. > +#if defined(__clang__) > +#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wnull-conversion" > +#endif > + > struct A {}; > > template<typename T, bool CanCatchNullptr> > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits