teemperor added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Analysis/CloneDetection.cpp:178
@@ +177,3 @@
+
+ bool VisitFunctionDecl(FunctionDecl *D) {
+ // If we found a function, we start the clone search on its body statement.
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> You'd probably want to add `ObjCMethodDecl` and `BlockDecl`, because they
> aren't sub-classes of `FunctionDecl` (and probably even tests for that).
>
> Because this part of the code essentially re-implements `AnalysisConsumer`,
> (a `RecursiveASTVisitor` that tells us what code bodies to analyze with the
> static analyzer - i should've looked there earlier!!).
>
> Alternatively, you can just rely on `AnalysisConsumer`, which would eliminate
> the recursive visitor completely: {F2205103} This way you'd be analyzing
> exactly the same code bodies that the analyzer itself would analyze; if you'd
> want to extend to various declarations, you'd be able to do that by
> subscribing on `check::ASTDecl`. But i dare not to predict what kind of
> different flexibility you'd need next.
Thanks for the patch!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D20795
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
