steakhal added a comment. In D138037#4003121 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138037#4003121>, @vabridgers wrote:
> Hi @steakhal, thanks for the suggested change. > How we can help move this forward? From what I'm comprehending from the > notes, perhaps we could try running this change through our internal systems > level test and fuzzer. Unfortunately, I'd not be able to say more than "trust > me, we saw no problems" if we see no problems. But if I do find additional > cases I can make simplified reproducers and we can work on addressing those. > Best! Well, I totally forgot about this change. I think we could evaluate if keeping alive the representatives would help or not. However, I cannot push this. I dont have the bandwidth. I'd be interrested to see other crashing cases you mentioned. Keep me informed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138037/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138037 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
