HazardyKnusperkeks accepted this revision.
HazardyKnusperkeks added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:1683
 
-        if (Tok->isOneOf(tok::kw_class, tok::kw_enum, tok::kw_concept,
-                         tok::kw_struct, tok::kw_using)) {
+        if (Tok->isOneOf(tok::kw_class, tok::kw_enum, tok::kw_struct,
+                         tok::kw_using)) {
----------------
rymiel wrote:
> HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> > Does this change anything, besides the penalties and by that the wrapping?
> > 
> > While I can live with both, I think we should not format code differently, 
> > if it's not by a bugfix.
> The only changes I could see:
>  - the change in `Context.IsExpression`, which causes the change in penalties;
>  - the fact that a new `AnnotatedLine` isn't created for the body of a 
> `concept` (i.e. the stuff after the equals sign), where as it previously was.
>  - some invalid syntax is formatted differently
> 
> It's very likely I don't have a "sample size" large enough.
> 
> I am also okay with doing both; I made this issue to gauge what is the 
> preferred direction by the reviewers.
Let's hear from @owenpan @MyDeveloperDay 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D140339/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D140339

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to