nridge accepted this revision. nridge added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks! ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/InlayHints.cpp:665 + // The sugared type is more useful in some cases, and the canonical + // type in other cases. For now, prefer the sugared type unless ---------------- small nit: could you put the comment inside the function, since it's more an explanation of the current logic in the implementation Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140814/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140814 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
