ilinpv added a comment.

In D127812#4031313 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127812#4031313>, @smeenai wrote:

> We can use `-mno-fmv` to avoid that dependency, right? We're interested in 
> using that for our own code (where we don't make use of function 
> multi-versioning), and want to prevent the compiler-rt support from being 
> pulled in from the archive unnecessarily. It'd still be available for users 
> who needed it.

Right, you will need to explicitly provide '-mno-fmv` then. Currently 
__aarch64_cpu_features stuff located in bultins 
(`libclang_rt.builtins-aarch64.a`). Did I understand you correctly that your 
apps linked agains libclang_rt.builtins-aarch64.a and if we move function 
multiversioning part to new library, lets say 
`libclang_rt.cpu_features-aarch64.a`, that will resolve your concern ? As a 
sidenote, builtins/cpu_model.c contains X86 CPU features used in function 
multiversioning on that target as well.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D127812/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D127812

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to