nikic accepted this revision.
nikic added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM

In D140800#4044983 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D140800#4044983>, 
@serge-sans-paille wrote:

> In D140800#4043723 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D140800#4043723>, @nikic wrote:
>
>> Just to check, this isn't going to cause some warning spew about all those 
>> OptTable implementations being non-final?
>
> nope. Why would there be?

Something about missing virtual destructors on a non-final class? Not sure when 
exactly that warning applies.



================
Comment at: llvm/unittests/Option/OptionParsingTest.cpp:327
 
-TEST(DISABLED_Option, FindNearestFIXME) {
-  TestOptTable T;
----------------
serge-sans-paille wrote:
> @nikic: the `DISABLED_` prefix seems to be a gtest convention, see 
> https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/main/docs/advanced.md#temporarily-disabling-tests
Huh, TIL.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D140800/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D140800

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to