abhinavgaba added a comment. In D141627#4049085 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141627#4049085>, @tianshilei1992 wrote:
> FWIW, I think `has_device_addr(b[0])` is not trying to take the value of > `b[0]` in this case. Instead, it's just to take the address of the first > element of `b`. Only pointer arithmetic will be involved. It's not > necessarily illegal to do it in that way. That is true. It would be wrong if `b` was a pointer, for which `&b[0]` computation would have involved a load. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141627/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141627 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
